White House journalists speak if Biden’s mental fall was intentionally hidden

White House journalists who covered the Biden administration are talking if they had been cheated by thinking that the president was mentally appropriate for office and if West Wing employees would try to hide the truth from the Americans.

Jake Tapper and Axios Reporter Alex Thompson “Original sin: the fall of President Biden, his coverage and his catastrophic choice to run again” was released on Tuesday and created many conversations between the White House press corpus as he put the issue again.

The book details the concerns of Joe Biden’s mental sharpness while in office, accusing Biden’s White House of lies about reporters and voters.

The elderly correspondent of the White House of Fox News Peter Doocy responded by posting numerous videos on X, questioning him Biden and the White House for the then president’s cognitive fall, just to be discarded quickly.

Other White House reporters saw the strange that CNN is related to the book, while some had strong feelings if there was really a “coverage”.

A White House reporter really believes that the White House clearly tried to hide the truth from everyone.

“It was a coverage of any definition, but a Quixotic for the Biden team he would have undertaken, because at the end of the day, there is only so much that a White House staff can do to protect the President of the United States from exposure to the press and the public. The coverage had both private and public dimensions,” the White Fox News reporter told the White House.

The reporter said private dimensions included “secret strategy and decision -making”, while public strategy presented “thick lies” such as the Biden video that appeared confused by colliding as “free counterfeits” and “the silence of reporters who printed the issue early”.

Dooocy and a small part of other brave reporters were regularly closed by the Karine Jean-Pierre press secretary if they dared to ask the president’s ability to duty.

“The subject that was denounced as so rude and strong to inquire about what eventually appeared as the defining issue of the Biden Presidency,” the White House reporter said.

A second White House reporter echoed the opinions of “The Daily Show” Jon Stewart, who on Monday exploded CNN for the ruthless promotion “a book about the news they should have told you was the news a year ago.”

“Resources are always more eager to speak after the fact, but it’s not a good picture that CNN – a heavy -duty attacker with a weight to challenge the White House after the fall happened – barely scratched the surface of the story that TAPPER reports now,” the second reporter of the White House told the Fox News Digital.

“Late work still deserves half the loan,” they added.

A White House reporter initially believed that 82-year-old Biden was simply old, or perhaps suffering from Covid’s side effects, and does not think the press is guilty.

“You know, is one of those things; the boy is old. He speaks as an elderly man and is getting more pronounced as time goes by,” the White House reporter said.

“I noticed, personally, a dramatic difference between when he took the task and the beginning of the second year. I suspected, and wondered, if it could be due to Covid and the consequences of Covid. He had it twice, I think … I know that some kind of brain fog could happen after you had it. “I remember a very different Joe Biden in 2014, 2015. He was a new decade, so it makes sense.”

The Third White House journalist “does not get” the idea that journalists should have been able to discover the truth about his declining health at the moment.

“How? How do you report it exactly? If you are a White House reporter, you have the responsibility to explain what happened that day. As in every white house, there is usually something that is happening every day,” they said, mentioning that reporting on Biden’s mental concerns would be a great enterprise story.

“People will not confirm medical things at all, they are not likely to tell you what he is privately … or in Wilmington, because it makes him look bad,” they said. “Now, the Biden White House didn’t crash. Just didn’t do it, so if you want to go after that story, you will spend weeks in it, and you may not get anything. In the meantime you are not doing other things.”

The same White House reporter is “hesitant” that Jean-Pierre has received so much heat for the regular insistence that biden was suitable for office.

“To the extent she says,” He’s more energetic than me, “it’s just silly, and she probably shouldn’t say that. On the other hand, to have it come out and say,” Oh, no, he is actually unable to do the job and should resign, “This is not realistic,” said the white house reporter, adding that of Jean-Person. There was from the skin.

“I mean, come on, you can’t wait for the Chief of Staff to say,” This guy can’t do the job, “they said.

The third White House journalist is not sure that Biden’s age influenced his work performance and believes that many of his shortcomings were merely “policy issues”.

“Would what would he have done much different if he were younger? I don’t know,” they said. “Until you tell me he did bad things because he wasn’t at work at that moment, you know, I get it with a grain of salt.”

Margaret Chadbourn covers the White House as a Cheddar correspondent, with a place in the conference room and is a member of the SHCA. She believes the whole Saga Biden has damaged the media confidence because Americans are wondering what she was missing, and why she was missing.

“Journalists have to do some spiritual research, perhaps, perhaps, and the questions covered the bidy as they should have, through the lenses they should have, asking the questions they should have, taking the facts and uniting them, or they should have asked for more facts,” Chadbourn Fox News Digital told.

“Should they have done more research?”, Continued Chadbern. “I just think there is an entire time limit that the media and reporters have to watch, not just Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson writing a book.”

Chadbourn, who has been covering and off Biden since 2005, said he was always loved and always “came alive by interacting with voters.” But as his heritage is determined, she believes there is anger among Americans over what people perceive as “misinformation for his health”.

“Not as a media critic, but as a journalist, a political reporter, we have to see what was there we probably lost,” Chadbourn said.

The first reporter of the White House to speak anonymously believes the truth will eventually come out.

“We will learn more about all this over time: first, in the memories of the aids, where they, for money, trafficking the misleading incidents and the sad details they knew at the time, and helped hide; and secondly, through the discovery of the archive, as we get the hands of White’s house, by email, and texts that will show mechanics that will show mechanics, which will show mechanics, which will show mechanics that will mechanics and mechanics. Answering Who’s Question Who, “FOX said.